Características clínicas, pronóstico y factores asociados de la bacteriemia por Staphylococcus aureus en la actualidad / Clinical characteristics and prognosis of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

Introducción. Describimos las características de los pacientes con bacteriemia por Staphylococcus aureus en un hospital de tercer nivel y analizamos sus complicaciones, la mortalidad y los factores asociados a las mismas. Métodos. Se analizaron de manera retrospectiva los datos de los pacientes ingresados con bacteriemia por S. aureus entre marzo de 2020 y febrero de 2021 en el hospital universitario Miguel Servet de Zaragoza. Resultados. La mortalidad a los 14 días fue del 24,2% y la mortalidad a los 30 días del 40%. La aparición de complicaciones [HR 3,1 (1,2-8,05)] y la edad >65 años [HR 3,1 (IC95% 1,4-6,6)] disminuyeron la supervivencia global de manera significativa. En la regresión logística se asociaron a mayor mortalidad a los 30 días la edad >65 años [OR 6,3 (IC95% 1,7-23,1)], la presencia de sepsis [OR 19,3 (IC95% 5,4-68,7)] y solo con cierta tendencia, el número de frascos de HC (+) ≥3 [OR 5,4 (IC95% 0,8-34,1)]. Se asoció a mayor mortalidad a los 14 días el haber presentado sepsis [OR 58,2 (IC95% 5,7-592,9)], el número frascos de HC (+) ≥3 [OR 14,1 (IC95% 1,1-173,7)] y una edad >65 años [OR 1,1 (IC95% 1,03-1,1) años]. Cuando analizamos juntos aquellos con un TP ≤12 horas y un número frascos de HC (+) ≥3, la sepsis fue más frecuente [30 pacientes (66,6%) vs 15 pacientes (33,3%); OR 3,4 (IC95% 1,5-8)]. Conclusiones. La mortalidad a los 14 y a los 30 días fue elevada, observándose una peor evolución en los pacientes con mayor edad, presencia de sepsis, un mayor número de frascos de hemocultivos positivos y un tiempo hasta hemocultivos positivos ≤12 h. (AU)

Introduction. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia patients characteristics at a tertiary hospital are described, and complications, mortality and associated factors are analyzed. Methods. Data from patients with S. aureus bacteremia admitted between March 2020 and February2021 at Miguel Servet university hospital in Zaragoza were retrospectively analyzed. Results. Results showed a 14 days mortality of 24.2% and an 30 days mortality of 40%. Overall survival decreased with complications appearance [HR 3.1 (1.2-8.05)] and age over 65 years [HR 3.1 (1.4-6.6)]. The adjusted analysis showed correlation between a higher mortality at 14 and 30 days with age over 65 years [OR 6.3 (1.7-23.1)], sepsis presence [OR 19.3 (5.4-68.7)] and number of positive (+) blood cultures ≥3 [OR 5.4 (0.8-34.1)]. Mortality at 14 days was associated with sepsis presence [OR 58.2 (5.7-592.9)], number of positive (+) blood cultures ≥3 [OR 14.1 (1.1-173.7)] and an older age [OR 1.1 (1.03-1.1)]. Analyzing time to positive blood cultures ≤12 hours and number of positive blood cultures ≥ 3 at the same time, frequency of sepsis increased [30 patients (66.6%) vs 15 patients (33.3%); OR 3.4 (IC95% 1.5-8)]. Conclusions. High 14- and 30-days mortality were found, as well as a worse evolution in older age patients, with sepsis presence, and with greater number of positive blood cultures and times to positive blood cultures ≤12 h. (AU)

Impacto de la bacteriemia por Staphylococcus aureus en pacientes con COVID-19 / Impact of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in COVID-19 patients

Introducción. La enfermedad causada por SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) ha supuesto un desafío para los profesionales sanitarios desde su aparición. Staphylococcus aureus es uno de los principales patógenos causantes de infecciones bacterianas en pandemias virales. Sin embargo, se debe estudiar bien la co-infección por S. aureus causante de bacteriemia en pacientes con COVID-19. Métodos. Se analizaron los casos de bacteriemia por S. aureus (BSA) atendidos en el Hospital Miguel Servet (Zaragoza) desde marzo de 2020 hasta febrero de 2021. Se compararon las características clínicas, los factores de riesgo y mortalidad de los pacientes con BSA asociada a COVID-19 respecto los pacientes no-COVID-19. Resultados. Se identificaron 95 pacientes con BSA. El 27,3% fueron COVID-19 positivos. La BSA representó el 9,9% de las bacteriemias, siendo el segundo microorganismo en frecuencia tras E. coli. La bacteriemia nosocomial fue más frecuente en el grupo de pacientes con COVID-19. La fuente de BSA fue desconocida en el 46,2% de los pacientes con COVID-19. La fuente de BSA más frecuente en estos pacientes fue la respiratoria (26,9% vs 0%; P<0,001) seguida de la cutánea (15,5% vs 15,9%; P=1). El desarrollo de sepsis fue más frecuente en los pacientes con COVID-19 (61,5% vs 7,8%; P=0,336) y de ellos, los que recibieron dosis de dexametasona >6 mg/día (62,5% vs 37,5%; P< 0,05). Conclusiones. Nuestros datos sugieren que la BSA influye negativamente en la evolución de los pacientes con COVID-19. Sin embargo, se requieren más estudios y preferiblemente prospectivos para obtener datos sólidos sobre el impacto de la BSA en los pacientes con coronavirus. (AU)

Introduction. The disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) has been a challenge for healthcare professionals since its appearance. Staphylococcus aureus has been described as one of the main pathogens causing bacterial infections in viral pandemics. However, co- infection with S. aureus causing bacteremia in patients with COVID-19 has yet to be well studied. Methods. We performed a e study of S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) at Hospital Miguel Servet (Zaragoza) from March 2020 to February 2021. The clinical characteristics, mortality and risk factors of adults hospitalized patients with BSA associated COVID-19 compared to patients without COVID-19. Results. A total of 95 patients with SAB were identified. 27.3% were positive for SARS-CoV-2. SAB represented 9.9% of bacteremia, being the second agent in frequency after E. coli. Nosocomial bacteremia was more frequent in the group of COVID-19 patients. The most frequent source of BSA in these patients was the respiratory source (26.9% vs 0%; P<0.001) followed by the skin (15.5% vs 15.9%; P=1). The development of sepsis was more frequent in COVID-19 patients (61,5% vs 7,8%; P=0,336) and among them, who received dexamethasone at doses > 6 mg/day (62.5% vs. 37.5%, P<0.05). Conclusions. Our data suggest that BSA has a negative impact on the evolution of patients with COVID-19. However, further and preferably prospective studies are required to obtain solid data on the impact of BSA on coronavirus patients. (AU)

Limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico en pacientes con bacteriemia / Limitation of therapeutic effort in patients with bacteremia

Introducción: La limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico (LET) depende de factores médicos, éticos e individuales. Describimos las características de los pacientes con bacteriemia en los que se decidió limitar el esfuerzo terapéutico. Métodos: Estudio prospectivo de las bacteriemias en un hospital comunitario durante el año 2011. Se recogieron variables de los pacientes (edad, sexo, índice de Barthel, comorbilidades, índice de Charlson y factores exógenos) y del episodio infeccioso (etiología, foco, lugar de adquisición, expresividad clínica, LET y mortalidad hospitalaria). Se comparó el grupo en el que se realizó LET con el que no. Resultados: Se recogieron 233 episodios de bacteriemia en 227 pacientes. Se realizó LET en 19 pacientes (8,2%). Los pacientes en los que se realizó LET eran de mayor edad (80,7 vs. 72,6 años, p= 0,014), tenían más comorbilidad (índice de Charlson 4,6 vs. 2,1, p<0,001) y con más frecuencia sufrían discapacidad grave (57,9% vs. 18,8%, p<0,001). No se encontró asociación con el sexo, el lugar de adquisición ni con la expresividad clínica de la infección. El foco clínico más frecuente en los casos de LET fue el urinario (42,1%) y predominaron los grampositivos (63,2%). El tratamiento empírico fue precoz en un 73,7%. Todos los pacientes excepto uno fallecieron. Conclusión: La LET se planteó en un número importante de los pacientes con bacteriemia, especialmente en aquellos con más edad, más comorbilidad y mayor dependencia funcional. El conocimiento de sus características diferenciales nos ayuda a comprender la toma de dicha decisión

Introduction: The limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) depends on medical, ethical and individual factors. We describe the characteristics of patients with bacteremia in which it was decided to limit the therapeutic effort Method: Prospective study of bacteremia in a community hospital in 2011. We collected information regarding patient variable (age, sex, Barthel index, comorbidities, Charlson Index and exogenous factors) as well as regarding the infectious episode (etiology, focus, place of adquisition, clinical expressivity, LTE and hospital mortality). The group in which LTE was performed was compared to the one that was not. Results: We collected 233 episodes of bacteremia in 227 patients. We performed LTE in 19 patients (8.2%). Patients with LTE were older (80.7 vs. 72.6 years, p=.014), had more comorbidity (Charlson index 4.6 vs. 2.1, p<.001 and most frequently were severe dependents (57.9% vs. 18.8%, p<.001). We found no association with sex, place of adquisition or clinical expressivity. The commonest clinical focus in patients with LTE was the urinary (42.1%) and there was a predominance of gram positive bacteria (63.2%). The empirical treatment was started early in 73.7% of cases. All patients except one died. Conclusion: LTE is considered in an important number of patients with bacteremia. They usually are older, with more comorbidity and functional dependence, bad functional basal status and important comorbidity. Knowing their differential characteristics allow us to understand this decision

[Limitation of therapeutic effort in patients with bacteremia]. / Limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico en pacientes con bacteriemia.

INTRODUCTION: The limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) depends on medical, ethical and individual factors. We describe the characteristics of patients with bacteremia in which it was decided to limit the therapeutic effort. METHOD: Prospective study of bacteremia in a community hospital in 2011. We collected information regarding patient variable (age, sex, Barthel index, comorbidities, Charlson Index and exogenous factors) as well as regarding the infectious episode (etiology, focus, place of adquisition, clinical expressivity, LTE and hospital mortality). The group in which LTE was performed was compared to the one that was not. RESULTS: We collected 233 episodes of bacteremia in 227 patients. We performed LTE in 19 patients (8.2%). Patients with LTE were older (80.7 vs. 72.6 years, p=.014), had more comorbidity (Charlson index 4.6 vs. 2.1, p<.001 and most frequently were severe dependents (57.9% vs. 18.8%, p<.001). We found no association with sex, place of adquisition or clinical expressivity. The commonest clinical focus in patients with LTE was the urinary (42.1%) and there was a predominance of gram positive bacteria (63.2%). The empirical treatment was started early in 73.7% of cases. All patients except one died. CONCLUSION: LTE is considered in an important number of patients with bacteremia. They usually are older, with more comorbidity and functional dependence, bad functional basal status and important comorbidity. Knowing their differential characteristics allow us to understand this decision.

Melatonin reduces locomotor activity and circulating cortisol in goldfish.

The present study focused on the effects of a subchronic melatonin treatment on locomotor activity and cortisol plasma levels in goldfish. We compared two different administration routes: peripheral (10 microg/g body weight) versus central (1 microg/microl) injections of melatonin for 7 or 4 days, respectively. Daily locomotor activity, including both diurnal and nocturnal activities, food anticipatory activity and circulating cortisol at 11:00 (under 24 h of food deprivation and 17 h postinjection) were significantly reduced after repeated intraperitoneal injections with melatonin for 7 days, but not after intracerebroventricular treatment. Taking in mind the anoretic effect of melatonin in this species, we investigated if such feeding reduction is directly responsible for the reduction in motor activity induced by melatonin treatment. Food restriction (50%) for 10 days did not significantly modify either daily locomotor activity or plasma cortisol levels in goldfish, indicating that the peripheral action of melatonin diminishing locomotor activity in goldfish is not a direct consequence of its anoretic action. In summary, our results indicate that, as previously described in other vertebrate species, melatonin can regulate locomotor activity and cortisol levels in goldfish, suggesting a sedative effect of this hormone in this teleost.